Framing an evidence based decision about 21st CCLC: How do we see the value? DOWNLOAD In this policy commentary, we do some reasoning about how 21st CCLC produces value and discuss the limitations in one particular way of seeing that value – the intent-to-treat impact evaluation design. You Might Also Like Preparing youth to thrive: Methodology and findings from the social and emotional learning challenge August 20, 2016 Oklahoma afterschool improvement process: Evaluation of 5 year trajectories January 1, 2017 Managing for positive youth development: Linking profiles of after-school program management to profiles of staff instructional performance November 17, 2012 Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Post navigation Previous Previous post: Afterschool quality systemsNext Next post: Quality-outcomes study for Seattle Public Schools summer programs, 2016 program cycle
