Framing an evidence based decision about 21st CCLC: How do we see the value? DOWNLOAD In this policy commentary, we do some reasoning about how 21st CCLC produces value and discuss the limitations in one particular way of seeing that value – the intent-to-treat impact evaluation design. You Might Also Like Findings from the PQA self-assessment pilot in Michigan 21st century learning centers September 11, 2005 Promoting Healthy Development of Young People: Outcomes Framework 2.0 October 23, 2019 Preparing youth to thrive: Methodology and findings from the social and emotional learning challenge August 20, 2016 Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Post navigation Previous Previous post: Afterschool quality systemsNext Next post: Quality-outcomes study for Seattle Public Schools summer programs, 2016 program cycle
